<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/</link>
	<description>Tony Perrie&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Please note that in the Java example the constructor was gotten by way of introspection, but it could have easily been gotten by way of just calling it.  Every class has a constructor.  So, even though Jim got the method pointer this way it still makes the example apocryphal.  For effect, I would say it&#039;s wrong because the examples all seem to indicate reflection is some kind of clone or copy constructor operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that in the Java example the constructor was gotten by way of introspection, but it could have easily been gotten by way of just calling it.  Every class has a constructor.  So, even though Jim got the method pointer this way it still makes the example apocryphal.  For effect, I would say it&#8217;s wrong because the examples all seem to indicate reflection is some kind of clone or copy constructor operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://involution.com/2006/07/19/reflection/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Well one thing&#039;s for sure - women &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; find you more attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well one thing&#8217;s for sure &#8211; women <em>will</em> find you more attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

